Cell Migration and Chemotaxis

References 

Cell migration

Abercrombie, M., Heaysman, J.E., & Pegrum, S.M. (1970). The locomotion of fibroblasts in culture III. Movements of particles on the dorsal surface of the leading lamella. Experimental Cell Research, 62(2), 389–398. Link
Wang, Y. L. (1985). Exchange of actin subunits at the leading edge of living fibroblasts: possible role of treadmilling. The Journal of Cell Biology, 101(2), 597–602. Link
Huber, F., Schnauss, J., Roenicke, S., Rauch, P., Mueller, K., Fuetterer, C., & Kaes, J. (2013). Emergent complexity of the cytoskeleton: from single filaments to tissue. Advances in Physics, 62(1), 1–112. Link.
Mak, M., Spill, F., Roger, K., & Zaman, M. (2016). Single-Cell Migration in Complex Microenvironments: Mechanics and Signaling Dynamics. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering, 138(2), 021004. Link.
Pebworth, Mark-Phillip, Cismas, Sabrina A., & Asuri, Prashanth. (2014). A novel 2.5D culture platform to investigate the role of stiffness gradients on adhesion-independent cell migration. PLOS ONE, 9(10), e110453. Link.
Shih, Wenting & Yamada, Soichiro. (2011). Live-cell Imaging of Migrating Cells Expressing Fluorescently-tagged Proteins in a Three-dimensional Matrix. Journal of Visualized Experiments, (58). Link.
Dormann, Dirk & Weijer, Cornelis J. (2006). Imaging of cell migration. The EMBO Journal, 25(15), 3480–3493. Link.
Willard, Stacey S & Devreotes, Peter N. (2006). Signaling pathways mediating chemotaxis in the social amoeba, Dictyostelium discoideum. European Journal of Cell Biology, 85(9–10), 897–904. Link.
"What is Cell Migration?". (n.d.). Cell Migration Gateway. Cell Migration Consortium. [url=URL_NOT_PROVIDED]Link[/url].
Bretscher, M. S. (1983). Distribution of receptors for transferrin and low density lipoprotein on the surface of giant HeLa cells. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 80(2), 454–8. Link.
Hopkins, C.R., Gibson, A., Shipman, M., Strickland, D.K., & Trowbridge, I.S. (1994). In migrating fibroblasts, recycling receptors are concentrated in narrow tubules in the pericentriolar area, and then routed to the plasma membrane of the leading lamella. J Cell Biol, 125(6), 1265–74. Link.
Mitchison, T., & Cramer, L.P. (1996). Actin-Based Cell Motility and Cell Locomotion. Cell, 84(3), 371–9. Link.
Bretscher, M. (1996). Getting Membrane Flow and the Cytoskeleton to Cooperate in Moving Cells. Cell, 8 7(4 ), 601–6. Link.
Pollard, T.D., & Borisy, G.G. (2003). Cellular Motility Driven by Assembly and Disassembly of Actin Filaments. Cell, 112(4), 453–65. Link.
Doherty, G.J., & McMahon, H.T. (2008). Mediation, Modulation, and Consequences of Membrane-Cytoskeleton Interactions. Annual Review of Biophysics, 37, 65–95. Link.
Yang, H., Ganguly, A., & Cabral, F. (2010). Inhibition of Cell Migration and Cell Division Correlates with Distinct Effects of Microtubule Inhibiting Drugs. The Journal of Biological Chemistry, 285(42), 32242–50. Link.
Ganguly, A., Yang, H., Sharma, R., Patel, K., & Cabral, F. (2012). The Role of Microtubules and Their Dynamics in Cell Migration. J Biol Chem, 287(52), 43359–69. Link.
Purcell, E. M. (1977). Life at Low Reynolds Number. American Journal of Physics, 45(3), 3–11. Link.
Bretscher, MS (1992). Circulating integrins: alpha5-beta1, alpha6-beta4 and Mac-1, but not alpha3-beta1, alpha4-beta1 or LFA-1. EMBO J, 11(2), 405–10. Link.
Aguado-Velasco, C; Bretscher, MS (1999). Circulation of the Plasma Membrane in Dictyostelium. Mol Biol Cell, 10(12), 4419–27. Link.
Thompson, CR; Bretscher, MS (2002). Cell polarity and locomotion, as well as endocytosis, depend on NSF. Development, 129(18), 4185–92. Link.
Bretscher, MS; Clotworthy, M (2007). Using single loxP sites to enhance homologous recombination: ts mutants in Sec1 of Dictyostelium discoideum. PLOS ONE, 2(8 ), e724. Link.
Barry, N.P.; Bretscher, M.S. (2010). Dictyostelium amoebae and neutrophils can swim. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 107(25), 11376–80. Link.
Zanchi, R; Howard, G; Bretscher, MS; Kay, RR (2010). The exocytic gene secA is required for Dictyostelium cell motility and osmoregulation. J Cell Biol, 123(Pt 19), 3226–34. Link.
Tanaka, Masahito; Kikuchi, Takeomi; Uno, Hiroyuki; Okita, Keisuke; Kitanishi-Yumura, Toshiko; Yumura, Shigehiko (2017). Turnover and flow of the cell membrane for cell migration. Scientific Reports, 7(1), 12970. Link.
O'Neill, Patrick; Castillo-Badillo, Jean; Meshik, Xenia; Kalyanaraman, Vani; Melgarejo, Krystal; Gautam, N (2018). Membrane flow drives an adhesion-independent amoeboid cell migration mode. Developmental Cell, 46(1), 9–22. Link.
Bell, George R. R.; Collins, Sean R. (2018). "Rho"ing a cellular boat with rearward membrane flow. Developmental Cell, 107(1), 1–3. Link.
Shellard, Adam; Szabo, Andras; Trepat, Xavier; Mayor, Roberto (2018). Supracellular contraction at the rear of neural crest cell groups drives collective chemotaxis. Science, 362(6412), 339–343. Link.
Coskun, Huseyin. (2006). Mathematical Models for Ameboid Cell Motility and Model Based Inverse Problems – via ProQuest.
Coskun, Huseyin; Li, Yi; Mackey, Mackey A. (Jan 2007). Ameboid cell motility: a model and inverse problem, with an application to live cell imaging data. J Theor Biol, 244(2), 169–79. Link.
Coskun, Hasan; Coskun, Huseyin. (March 2011). Cell physician: reading cell motion. A mathematical diagnostic technique through analysis of single cell motion. Bull Math Biol, 73(3), 658–82. Link.
Parent, C. A.; Devreotes, PN (1999). A Cell's Sense of Direction. Science, 284(5415), 765–70. Link.
Ridley, A. J.; Schwartz, MA; Burridge, K; Firtel, RA; Ginsberg, MH; Borisy, G; Parsons, JT; Horwitz, AR (2003). Cell Migration: Integrating Signals from Front to Back. Science, 302(5651), 1704–9. Link.
Li, Rong; Gundersen, Gregg G. (2008). Beyond polymer polarity: how the cytoskeleton builds a polarized cell. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, 9(11), 860–873. Link.
Meyer, A.S.; Hughes-Alford, S.K.; Kay, J.E.; Castillo, A; Wells, A; Gertler, F.B.; Lauffenburger, D.A. (2012). 2D protrusion but not motility predicts growth factor–induced cancer cell migration in 3D collagen. J. Cell Biol, 197(6), 721–729. Link.
Banerjee, Tatsat; Biswas, Debojyoti; Pal, Dhiman Sankar; Miao, Yuchuan; Iglesias, Pablo A; Devreotes, Peter N (2022). Spatiotemporal dynamics of membrane surface charge regulates cell polarity and migration. Nature Cell Biology, 24(10), 1499–1515. Link.
"Profiling Cells with Math". Mathematical Association of America.

Genetic Components

Artavanis-Tsakonas, S., Rand, M. D., & Lake, R. J. (1999). Notch signaling: cell fate control and signal integration in development. Science, 284(5415), 770–776. Link

Epigenetic Components of Signaling Pathways

Prieto, Daniel, Aparicio, Gonzalo, & Sotelo-Silveira, Jose R. (2017). Cell migration analysis: A low-cost laboratory experiment for cell and developmental biology courses using keratocytes from fish scales. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 45(6), 475–482. Link

Signaling Pathways

Artavanis-Tsakonas, S., Rand, M. D., & Lake, R. J. (1999). Notch signaling: cell fate control and signal integration in development. Science, 284(5415), 770–776. Link
Willard, Stacey S & Devreotes, Peter N. (2006). Signaling pathways mediating chemotaxis in the social amoeba, Dictyostelium discoideum. European Journal of Cell Biology, 85(9–10), 897–904. Link

Regulatory Codes

Parent, C. A.; Devreotes, PN (1999). A Cell's Sense of Direction. Science, 284(5415), 765–770. Link
Ridley, A. J.; Schwartz, MA; Burridge, K; Firtel, RA; Ginsberg, MH; Borisy, G; Parsons, JT; Horwitz, AR (2003). Cell Migration: Integrating Signals from Front to Back. Science, 302(5651), 1704–1709. Link

Evolution

Shellard, Adam; Szabo, Andras; Trepat, Xavier; Mayor, Roberto (2018). Supracellular contraction at the rear of neural crest cell groups drives collective chemotaxis. Science, 362(6412), 339–343. Link

Interdependency

Yang, H., Ganguly, A., & Cabral, F. (2010). Inhibition of Cell Migration and Cell Division Correlates with Distinct Effects of Microtubule Inhibiting Drugs. The Journal of Biological Chemistry, 285(42), 32242–50. Link
Ganguly, A., Yang, H., Sharma, R., Patel, K., & Cabral, F. (2012). The Role of Microtubules and Their Dynamics in Cell Migration. J Biol Chem, 287(52), 43359–69. Link
Li, Rong; Gundersen, Gregg G. (2008). Beyond polymer polarity: how the cytoskeleton builds a polarized cell. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, 9(11), 860–873. Link


Chemotaxis

Overview

Nedeljković, Marko; Sastre, Diego; Sundberg, Eric (14 July 2021). "Bacterial Flagellar Filament: A Supramolecular Multifunctional Nanostructure". International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 22 (14): 7521. doi:10.3390/ijms22147521. PMC 8306008. PMID 34299141.
Zhong, Maohua; Yan, Huimin; Li, Yaoming (October 2017). "Flagellin: a unique microbe-associated molecular pattern and a multi-faceted immunomodulator". Cellular & Molecular Immunology. 14 (10): 862–864. doi:10.1038/cmi.2017.78. ISSN 2042-0226. PMC 5649114. PMID 28845044.
Berg HC (2003). E. coli in motion. New York, NY: Springer. ISBN 978-0-387-00888-2.
Wadhams, George H.; Armitage, Judith P. (December 2004). "Making sense of it all: bacterial chemotaxis". Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology. 5 (12): 1024–1037. doi:10.1038/nrm1524. PMID 15573139. S2CID 205493118.
Galperin, Michael (June 2005). "A census of membrane-bound and intracellular signal transduction proteins in bacteria: Bacterial IQ, extroverts and introverts". BMC Microbiology. 5: 35. doi:10.1186/1471-2180-5-35. PMC 1183210. PMID 15955239.
Gennaro Auletta (2011). Cognitive Biology: Dealing with Information from Bacteria to Minds. United States: Oxford University Press. p. 266. ISBN 978-0-19-960848-5.
Berg, H.C. & Purcell, E.M. (1977). Physics of chemoreception. Biophysical Journal, 20/i, 193-219. Link

Genetic Components

Falke, Joseph J.; Bass, Randal B.; Butler, Scott L.; Chervitz, Stephen A.; Danielson, Mark A. (1997). "THE TWO-COMPONENT SIGNALING PATHWAY OF BACTERIAL CHEMOTAXIS: A Molecular View of Signal Transduction by Receptors, Kinases, and Adaptation Enzymes". Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology. 13: 457–512. doi:10.1146/annurev.cellbio.13.1.457. ISSN 1081-0706. PMC 2899694. PMID 9442881.
Vladimirov, N. & Sourjik, V. (2009). Chemotaxis: how bacteria use memory. [i]Biological Chemistry, 390/i, 1097-1104. Link

Epigenetic Components

Wadhams, George H.; Armitage, Judith P. (December 2004). "Making sense of it all: bacterial chemotaxis". Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology. 5 (12): 1024–1037. doi:10.1038/nrm1524. ISSN 1471-0080. PMID 15573139. S2CID 205493118.

Signaling Pathways

Shu Chien; Peter C Y Chen; Y C Fung (2008). An Introductory Text to Bioengineering (Advanced Series in Biomechanics - Vol. 4). Singapore: World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd. p. 418. ISBN 9789812707932.
Cluzel P, Surette M, Leibler S (March 2000). "An ultrasensitive bacterial motor revealed by monitoring signaling proteins in single cells". Science. 287 (5458): 1652–5. Bibcode:2000Sci...287.1652C. doi:10.1126/science.287.5458.1652. PMID 10698740. S2CID 5334523.
Sourjik V (December 2004). "Receptor clustering and signal processing in E. coli chemotaxis". Trends in Microbiology. 12 (12): 569–76. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.318.4824. doi:10.1016/j.tim.2004.10.003. PMID 15539117.
Xu F, Bierman R, Healy F, Nguyen H (2016). "A multi-scale model of Escherichia coli chemotaxis from intracellular signaling pathway to motility and nutrient uptake in nutrient gradient and isotropic fluid environments". Computers & Mathematics with Applications. 71 (11): 2466–2478. doi:10.1016/j.camwa.2015.12.019.
Ghose, D. & Lew, D. (2020). Mechanistic insights into actin-driven polarity site movement in yeast. Molecular Biology of the Cell, 31/i, 1085-1102. Link
Skoge, M. et al. (2014). Cellular memory in eukaryotic chemotaxis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111/i, 14448-14453. Link

Regulatory Codes

Kutscher, B., Devreotes, P., & Iglesias, P.A. (2004). Local excitation, global inhibition mechanism for gradient sensing: an interactive applet. Science's STKE, 2004/i, pl3. Link
Xiong, Y. et al. (2010). Cells navigate with a local-excitation, global-inhibition-biased excitable network. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107/i, 17079-17086. Link

Evolution

Köhidai, L. (1999). Chemotaxis: the proper physiological response to evaluate phylogeny of signal molecules. Acta Biologica Hungarica, 50/i, 375-394. Link
Köhidai L (2016), "Chemotaxis as an Expression of Communication of Tetrahymena", in Witzany G, Nowacki M (eds.), Biocommunication of Ciliates, pp. 65–82, doi:10.1007/978-3-319-32211-7_5, ISBN 978-3-319-32211-7

Interdependency

Wadhams, George H.; Armitage, Judith P. (December 2004). "Making sense of it
Kedrin, D. et al. (2007). Cell motility and cytoskeletal regulation in invasion and metastasis. Journal of Mammary Gland Biology and Neoplasia, 12/i, 143-152. Link
Solnica-Krezel, L. & Sepich, D.S. (2012). Gastrulation: making and shaping germ layers. Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology, 28, 687-717. Link
Shellard, A. & Mayor, R. (2016). Chemotaxis during neural crest migration. Seminars in Cell & Developmental Biology, 55, 111-118. Link
Becker, E.L. (1977). Stimulated neutrophil locomotion: chemokinesis and chemotaxis. Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, 101/i, 509-513. Link
Köhidai, L. & Csaba, G. (1998). Chemotaxis and chemotactic selection induced with cytokines in Tetrahymena pyriformis. Cytokine, 10/i, 481-486. Link

Cell Migration and Chemotaxis

Cell Migration and Chemotaxis Overview

Cell migration is a fundamental biological process where cells move from one location to another within an organism. Chemotaxis, a specific type of cell migration, involves the directed movement of cells in response to chemical gradients, typically towards higher or lower concentrations of signaling molecules. The journey of a migrating cell begins with the act of sensing, where cells, through receptors on their surface, detect the subtle whispers of signaling molecules in their environment. These molecules, known as chemoattractants or chemorepellents, guide the cells, leading them to their destinations. This initial sensing is not a simple reaction to external stimuli but a discerning process, akin to a skilled navigator reading the stars, pointing to an inherent wisdom embedded within each cell. Following the detection of these cues, cells undergo a remarkable transformation, establishing a front and a rear, a process known as polarization. This step is akin to a ship setting its course, with the cell extending pseudopodia, much like the bow of a ship, towards its destination while retracting its trailing edge. The elegance of this polarization process, where each part of the cell knows its role in the journey, speaks to a design of incredible foresight and sophistication.

As the cell sets its course, the actin within its cytoskeleton begins to polymerize at the leading edge, pushing the cell membrane forward. This act of actin polymerization, driving the protrusion of the cell in the direction of movement, is reminiscent of a sailor unfurling the sails, harnessing the wind to propel the ship forward. The orchestration of these molecular events, ensuring the cell moves in the right direction, highlights a level of coordination that surpasses mere biological machinery. Adhesion and traction follow, where the cell anchors itself to the substrate, much like a climber using ropes and hooks to ascend a mountain. These specialized adhesion structures not only secure the cell but also generate the traction needed for movement. This step, crucial for the cell's progression, reflects a system designed for both stability and mobility, enabling the cell to navigate the complex terrain of its environment. The journey continues with contractility, where actin-myosin interactions lead to contraction at the cell's rear, propelling it forward. This contraction, akin to the drawing in of a net, gathers the cell's resources, focusing its energy on the path ahead. The precision of this contraction, ensuring that the cell moves efficiently and effectively, is a testament to a design that values both form and function.

Finally, the cycle of movement concludes with the release and reattachment of the trailing edge, allowing the cell to repeat this process as it moves towards its goal. This continuous cycle of detachment and reattachment, ensuring the cell's forward momentum, mirrors the steps of a journeyman, each stride bringing them closer to their destination. This orchestrated movement of cells, from sensing to reattachment, is not a series of random events but a choreographed sequence, pointing to a guiding hand in the design of life. The complexity and harmony of these steps, ensuring that each cell reaches its rightful place, speak not to a slow process of evolution but to an intelligent design, where every element serves a purpose in the grand scheme of creation.

Sensing: Cells detect external cues through receptors on their surface that bind to signaling molecules called chemoattractants or chemorepellents.
Polarization: Upon sensing a gradient, the cell establishes a front-rear polarity, extending pseudopodia (cellular projections) at the leading edge and retracting the trailing edge.
Actin Polymerization: Actin filaments within the cell's cytoskeleton polymerize at the leading edge, driving protrusion of the cell membrane in the direction of movement.
Adhesion and Traction: Cells adhere to the substrate through specialized adhesion structures, generating traction for movement.
Contractility: Actin-myosin interactions lead to contraction at the cell's rear, enabling the cell to move forward.
Release and Reattachment: The trailing edge detaches, and the cycle repeats as the cell moves.

Importance in Biological Systems

From the earliest moments of existence, during the delicate stages of embryogenesis, cells embark on meticulously charted paths, moving with purpose to their destined locations. This migration is not aimless but orchestrated, ensuring that tissues and organs are formed with the precision necessary for life to thrive. The orchestration of these movements, like dancers in a ballet, speaks to a choreography laid out by a master planner, ensuring that each cell contributes to the emergence of form and function in perfect harmony. The realm of the immune response further illustrates the marvel of cellular migration. Immune cells, ever vigilant, respond to the clarion call of distress signals, navigating the complex terrain of the body to reach sites of infection or injury. This targeted migration, guided by chemotactic signals, is emblematic of a system designed for protection and healing, a testament to the foresight embedded within life's fabric. In the aftermath of injury, the process of tissue repair showcases the resilience and regenerative capability inherent in the design of life. Cells, guided by the same principles of migration and chemotaxis, converge on wounds, knitting together the fabric of the body with remarkable efficiency. This capacity for self-repair, a hallmark of a system designed with redundancy and resilience, underscores the ingenuity of the life's underlying architecture.

The phenomenon of cancer metastasis, while a departure from the harmonious operation of cellular migration, underscores the delicate balance upon which life is poised. Malignant cells exploit the mechanisms of migration to spread, highlighting the intricate systems that, when functioning as intended, contribute to the maintenance of health and order. Lastly, the formation of neural connections during brain development exemplifies the precision of cellular movement in crafting the complex networks that underpin thought, emotion, and consciousness. Neurons, migrating to their precise locations, weave a tapestry of connectivity that becomes the substrate for the mind's vast capabilities. Each of these instances of cell migration and chemotaxis, from the formation of the body's structure to the defense against disease, from the healing of wounds to the establishment of neural networks, reflects a level of sophistication and intentionality that transcends mere chance. The orchestrated movements of cells, guided by signals and pathways laid out with meticulous care, speak to the presence of a guiding intelligence, an architect of life who has endowed the natural world with the capacity for growth, healing, and adaptation.

Development: During embryogenesis, cells migrate to their designated positions to form tissues and organs.
Immune Response: Immune cells migrate to sites of infection or injury guided by chemotactic signals, aiding in defense.
Tissue Repair: Cell migration is involved in wound healing and tissue regeneration.
Cancer Metastasis: Malignant cells migrate to distant locations, contributing to cancer spread.
Neural Connectivity: Neurons migrate during brain development to establish proper neural circuits.

The ability of cells to migrate and respond to chemical gradients is essential for proper development, tissue maintenance, immune responses, and disease processes. Chemotaxis allows cells to navigate complex environments and locate specific targets with precision, ensuring the proper functioning of various physiological processes.

How do cell migration and chemotaxis contribute to tissue morphogenesis and repair?

Cell migration and chemotaxis are essential processes that play crucial roles in tissue morphogenesis and repair. They enable cells to move within tissues and respond to chemical gradients, guiding their movement to specific locations. Here's how these processes contribute to tissue morphogenesis and repair:

Tissue Morphogenesis

During tissue development, cells need to move to specific positions to contribute to the formation of complex structures. Cell migration allows cells to reach their intended destinations and organize themselves into the correct spatial patterns.

Pattern Formation: Migrating cells can form distinct patterns that are critical for tissue organization. For example, during neural tube formation, neural crest cells migrate and contribute to the formation of various structures, including sensory organs and craniofacial tissues.
Boundary Formation: Migrating cells can establish boundaries between different tissue compartments. This helps create well-defined tissue structures with distinct functions. For instance, during limb development, migrating cells contribute to the formation of digit boundaries.

Tissue Repair

Cell migration and chemotaxis are crucial for repairing damaged tissues and restoring their normal function. After injury, cells need to move to the site of damage to initiate repair processes.

Wound Healing: In the context of wound healing, migrating cells from the surrounding tissue move into the wound area to close the gap and regenerate damaged tissue. Fibroblasts and epithelial cells are examples of cells that migrate to promote wound closure.
Immune Response: Immune cells, such as neutrophils and macrophages, use chemotaxis to migrate to sites of infection or tissue damage. They help clear debris, remove pathogens, and promote tissue healing.

Chemotaxis and Guidance

Chemotaxis is the directed movement of cells along chemical gradients. Cells respond to concentration gradients of signaling molecules, called chemoattractants or chemorepellents, by migrating towards or away from their source.

Axon Guidance: During nervous system development, axons of growing neurons migrate along specific pathways to establish neuronal connections. Chemotactic cues guide axon growth toward their target destinations.
Immune Cell Recruitment: Immune cells migrate towards sites of inflammation or infection in response to chemotactic signals released by damaged tissues. This allows immune cells to reach the site of action quickly.

Regeneration

In tissue regeneration, cell migration and chemotaxis are critical for restoring tissue function after injury or damage.

Stem Cell Homing: Stem cells can migrate to injured tissues and differentiate into specialized cell types needed for regeneration. For example, in bone marrow transplantation, hematopoietic stem cells migrate to the bone marrow niche to restore blood cell production.
Neuronal Regeneration: After nervous system injury, neuronal precursor cells can migrate to damaged areas to replace lost neurons and contribute to functional recovery.

Appearance of Cell Migration and Chemotaxis in the evolutionary timeline  

Cell migration and chemotaxis are ancient biological phenomena that would have emerged early in the evolutionary timeline. While the exact origins are challenging to pinpoint, these processes are observed across a wide range of organisms, from single-celled bacteria to complex multicellular organisms. 

Early Prokaryotes

Chemotaxis in Bacteria: Even simple, single-celled organisms like bacteria exhibit chemotactic behavior. They can move towards or away from certain chemicals in their environment, aiding their survival and resource acquisition.

Protists and Simple Eukaryotes

Emergence of Eukaryotic Cells: The evolution of eukaryotic cells allowed for more complex migration mechanisms due to the presence of cytoskeletal elements like actin and microtubules.
Simple Eukaryotic Movement: Early eukaryotic organisms, like amoebas and other protists, used cell migration for finding nutrients, escaping predators, and other basic functions.

Multicellular Organisms

Tissue Formation: As multicellularity evolved, cell migration became essential for shaping tissues and organs during development. This is especially evident in processes like gastrulation in embryos.
Immune Response: Cell migration is vital for immune cells to reach infection sites and participate in immune responses.

Complex Organisms

Tissue Repair and Regeneration: In more complex organisms, cell migration is involved in wound healing and tissue regeneration.
Neural Migration: In vertebrates, neural crest cells and neurons migrate extensively during development to form the nervous system.

Evolution of Chemotaxis Mechanisms

Diversification of Receptors: Over time, organisms evolved a variety of receptors that allowed them to sense different chemical cues in their environment, enabling more sophisticated chemotactic responses.
Fine-Tuning of Signaling Pathways: As organisms became more complex, their signaling pathways and downstream responses became more refined.

De Novo Genetic Information necessary to instantiate Cell Migration and Chemotaxis

Creating the complex mechanisms of Cell Migration and Chemotaxis from scratch by introducing new genetic information in the correct sequence is a hypothetical scenario that requires careful consideration. Keep in mind that this is a speculative exercise and not reflective of any known scientific process. 

Origin of Genetic Information

New genetic information encoding the proteins, receptors, signaling pathways, and regulatory elements required for cell migration and chemotaxis would need to emerge. This could involve random mutations, gene duplications, or horizontal gene transfer events.

Sequential Genetic Assembly

The genes encoding the necessary components would have to be assembled in a specific sequence to ensure functional interactions. Regulatory elements, such as promoters and enhancers, would need to be in place to control gene expression in response to signals.

Coding for Protein Machinery

Genes would encode the proteins involved in cell migration and chemotaxis, including receptors, signaling molecules, cytoskeletal elements (actin and microtubules), and adhesion molecules.The coding sequences must accurately reflect the protein structures and functions required for cellular movement.

Signal Detection and Transduction

Genes coding for receptors capable of sensing chemical gradients (chemoreceptors) would be introduced. These receptors would need to respond to specific ligands (chemoattractants or chemorepellents) by initiating signaling cascades.

Cytoskeletal Rearrangement

New genes would code for actin-binding proteins, microtubules, and motor proteins to enable dynamic cytoskeletal rearrangements required for cell movement and polarization.

Adhesion Mechanisms

Genes encoding adhesion molecules like integrins and cadherins would need to be in place. These molecules allow cells to anchor to substrates and communicate with other cells.

Signaling Pathways and Feedback Loops

Genetic information for signaling pathways such as MAPK, PI3K-AKT, and Rho GTPases would be introduced. Feedback loops involving regulatory elements and proteins would help fine-tune responses and ensure proper coordination of movement.

Cell-Polarity Genes

Genes responsible for establishing cell polarity and guiding the direction of movement would be necessary.

Chemoattractant and Chemorepellent Production

Genes encoding chemoattractant and chemorepellent molecules would need to be introduced. These molecules would establish the chemical gradients that cells respond to.

Regulatory Networks

Complex networks of regulatory genes and elements would ensure precise temporal and spatial control over the expression of migration-related genes. It's important to emphasize that the simultaneous emergence and correct integration of all these genetic components, in a functional and coordinated manner, is an enormous challenge from an evolutionary perspective. The intricate interplay between various components, the requirement for precise spatial and temporal regulation, and the need for functional systems from the outset raise questions about the plausibility of such a scenario occurring through a stepwise evolutionary process. This hypothetical scenario highlights the complexity and interdependence of genetic information required for cell migration and chemotaxis.

Manufacturing codes and languages employed to instantiate  Cell Migration and Chemotaxis

Transitioning from an organism without Cell Migration and Chemotaxis to one with fully developed mechanisms requires the establishment and utilization of various manufacturing codes and languages beyond genetic information. These non-genetic regulatory elements contribute to the complexity of creating functional cell migration and chemotaxis systems:

Post-Translational Modification Codes

Phosphorylation Codes: Specific amino acid residues (e.g., serine, threonine, tyrosine) in proteins are phosphorylated by kinases. This code regulates protein activity and interactions during migration.
Acetylation and Methylation Codes: Modifications like acetylation and methylation influence protein-protein interactions, affecting cellular functions including migration.

Secretion and Localization Codes

Signal Peptide Sequences: Proteins destined for secretion or membrane insertion carry signal peptides that guide their trafficking to the correct cellular compartment.
Sorting Motifs: Specific amino acid sequences direct proteins to particular cellular locations, enabling proper distribution of migration-related molecules.

Extracellular Matrix Interaction Codes

Extracellular Matrix (ECM) Binding Domains: Proteins involved in cell adhesion contain domains that interact with components of the ECM, aiding migration by providing attachment points.

Chemotactic Gradient Decoding Codes

Receptor Sensing Domains: Receptors capable of detecting chemotactic gradients possess specific sensing domains that recognize chemoattractant or chemorepellent molecules.
Signal Amplification Codes: Intracellular proteins amplify signals from receptors, enhancing cellular response to subtle changes in chemotactic cues.

Cytoskeletal Dynamics Codes

Actin-Binding Domains: Proteins involved in cell movement possess domains that bind to actin filaments, promoting cytoskeletal rearrangements.
Microtubule-Binding Sequences: For polarized movement, microtubule-binding proteins interact with microtubules to guide directional migration.

Adhesion and Traction Codes

Adhesion Motifs: Cell adhesion molecules contain specific motifs that allow them to bind to extracellular matrix components or other cells, facilitating migration and substrate attachment.
Integrin Activation Sequences: Integrins, key adhesion molecules, switch between active and inactive states through conformational changes controlled by regulatory sequences.

Signaling Network Activation Codes

Activation Loop Sequences: Kinases and other signaling molecules contain specific sequences that must be phosphorylated for full activation, ensuring proper signaling cascades.

Feedback Loop Integration Codes

Feedback Regulator Domains: Proteins involved in feedback loops possess domains that allow them to modulate upstream components, fine-tuning migration responses.

Chemoattractant Gradient Sensing Codes

Receptor Gradient Sensing Regions: Receptors sensitive to chemoattractants have regions that respond to concentration gradients, guiding directional movement.

Polarity Establishment Codes

Polarity Domain Sequences: Proteins involved in polarity establishment contain sequences that enable the cell to distinguish front from rear, crucial for directed migration.

These manufacturing codes and languages, in conjunction with genetic information, orchestrate the intricate processes of cell migration and chemotaxis. Their precise organization and interplay are essential for creating a functional system capable of responding to chemical cues and facilitating directed movement. The simultaneous emergence and coordination of these regulatory elements raise questions about the plausibility of their gradual evolution through a stepwise process.

How did the mechanisms for cell migration and chemotaxis emerge to ensure proper cellular positioning and tissue integrity?

The mechanisms for cell migration and chemotaxis are claimed to have evolved over time to ensure proper cellular positioning and tissue integrity in multicellular organisms. 

Evolution of Receptor-Ligand Interactions: Cell migration and chemotaxis involves the recognition of signaling molecules (chemoattractants) by cell surface receptors. Over time, the evolution of diverse receptors and ligands would have allowed cells to respond to a wider range of signals. Mutations that conferred selective advantages, such as enhanced response to beneficial cues or avoidance of harmful ones, would have been favored through natural selection.
Adaptation to Environmental Niches: Cells supposedly evolved in various environments with distinct chemical gradients. Those cells that could sense and move toward or away from specific gradients would have had a survival advantage. This adaptation to diverse niches and chemical cues would have contributed to the emergence of chemotaxis as a widespread mechanism.
Co-Opting Existing Pathways: Some components of the cell migration and chemotaxis machinery would have originated from pre-existing cellular processes. For instance, the cytoskeletal elements that are crucial for cell migration, such as actin filaments, are involved in various cellular functions. Evolution would have co-opted these components for directed cell movement by modifying their regulation and interactions.
Gradual Complexity Building: The evolution of cell migration and chemotaxis would have involved the gradual accumulation of components that enhance cellular movement and response to chemical gradients. These components would have provided selective advantages in terms of finding nutrients, avoiding toxins, and positioning cells optimally within tissues.
Development of Cell-Cell Communication: As multicellular organisms would have evolved, communication between cells would have become essential for coordinated tissue development and repair. Chemical signals released by cells could have served as cues for guiding cell migration. Over time, the ability to detect and respond to these signals would have become more refined.
Genetic Diversification and Adaptation: Genetic mutations and recombination would have led to diversity in the traits related to cell migration and chemotaxis. Variations that improved the efficiency, accuracy, and fidelity of these processes would have been favored, contributing to the evolution of more sophisticated mechanisms.
Coordinated Evolution of Related Processes: Cell migration and chemotaxis are interconnected with other cellular processes, such as cytoskeletal dynamics and membrane remodeling. As these related processes supposedly evolved, the mechanisms of cell migration and chemotaxis would have co-evolved to integrate with them seamlessly.

Is there scientific evidence supporting the idea that Cell Migration and Chemotaxis were brought about by the process of evolution?

The processes of Cell Migration and Chemotaxis present a profound challenge to a gradual, stepwise evolutionary explanation. The complexity, interdependence, and precision of these mechanisms suggest that they required simultaneous and purposeful instantiation, rather than piecemeal evolution.

Functional Interdependence

The components involved in cell migration and chemotaxis, including codes, languages, signaling pathways, and proteins, are profoundly interdependent. Each element relies on others to function meaningfully. For example, chemotactic receptors would have no purpose without downstream signaling pathways, and these pathways would lack guidance without the presence of chemoattractants or chemorepellents.

Complex Simultaneous Requirements

The numerous genes, codes, and molecules required for cell migration and chemotaxis must be present and functional at the same time. Waiting for each of these complex elements to evolve independently, and then functionally synchronizing them, presents insurmountable odds.

Irreducible Complexity

The irreducible nature of these systems implies that intermediate stages lacking any component would be non-functional and non-selectable. Codes, languages, signaling pathways, and proteins need to be operational together from the outset to enable directed migration.

Lack of Gradual Functionality

Unlike simpler traits that could evolve incrementally, the mechanisms of cell migration and chemotaxis are unlikely to have had any selective advantage in their initial, incomplete stages. A receptor without its corresponding ligand or downstream signaling would not provide any fitness advantage, making gradual development improbable.

Coordinated Precision

Achieving the precision required for proper cell migration involves an intricate coordination of multiple components. The correct positioning of cells, polarity establishment, and dynamic cytoskeletal rearrangements demand an immediate, organized implementation rather than a gradual trial-and-error process.

Purposeful Directionality

Cell migration and chemotaxis require not only functioning components but also a directional purpose. The establishment of gradients and the guidance of cells toward specific locations imply an intended orientation, suggesting the involvement of foresight and planning.

The complex and interdependent nature of Cell Migration and Chemotaxis points toward a comprehensive and simultaneous instantiation of all necessary components. Intelligent design provides a compelling explanation for the emergence of these complex mechanisms, as it accounts for the intricacies, the precision, and the purposeful nature of their formation.

Irreducibility and Interdependence of the systems to instantiate and operate Cell Migration and Chemotaxis

The intricate orchestration of manufacturing, signaling, and regulatory codes and languages in the development and operation of Cell Migration and Chemotaxis is compelling evidence for their irreducible and interdependent nature. These interconnections signify a purposeful, simultaneous instantiation rather than a stepwise evolutionary process. 

Irreducible and Interdependent Components

The cell's ability to decode chemical gradients hinges on the presence of specialized receptors. These receptors, attuned to the subtle cues of chemoattractants or chemorepellents, serve as the cell's eyes and ears, guiding it along its path. The activation of these receptors triggers a cascade of signals, setting in motion the cell's journey. The absence of these receptors, or a break in the signaling chain, would render the cell directionless, underscoring the critical role of this finely tuned mechanism in the cell's navigation. As the cell interprets these signals, a remarkable transformation occurs within its cytoskeleton. Signaling pathways, such as PI3K-AKT and Rho GTPases, amplify the initial cues, orchestrating a symphony of actin polymerization and cytoskeletal rearrangements. This delicate balance of construction and deconstruction within the cell's framework propels it forward, a clear indication of a design that anticipates and provides for the dynamic nature of cellular life. Integral to the cell's movement is the coupling of adhesion and traction. Integrins and other adhesion molecules, the cell's hands and feet, allow it to grasp the substrate, pulling itself forward with each step. This interplay of adhesion and release, so crucial to effective migration, reflects a level of engineering sophistication that ensures the cell's journey is both directed and efficient.

Underpinning this entire process is a network of transcription factors and regulatory pathways that govern gene expression. The precise coordination of migration-related genes, facilitated by transcription factors and epigenetic marks, ensures that the cell's machinery is finely tuned for the journey ahead. The disruption of this regulatory network would bring the cell's migration to a halt, highlighting the indispensable role of these elements in the orchestration of cellular movement. This complex interplay of mechanisms, each dependent on the other, reveals a system of unparalleled complexity and precision. The seamless integration of sensing, signaling, and movement in the cellular realm points not to a gradual accumulation of functions through trial and error but to a purposeful design, where every component, every pathway, and every signal contributes to the harmonious movement of life. In this light, the cell's journey is not a tale of random chance but a narrative of intentional creation, where each step is guided by a design that transcends our understanding.

Chemotactic Gradient Decoding and Signaling: Chemotaxis relies on receptors that decode chemoattractant or chemorepellent gradients. Without these receptors, downstream signaling pathways would lack activation cues, rendering directional movement impossible.
Signal Amplification and Cytoskeletal Rearrangement: Signaling pathways like PI3K-AKT and Rho GTPases amplify receptor signals to orchestrate actin polymerization and cytoskeletal rearrangements. Absence of either component would lead to incomplete migration responses.
Adhesion and Traction Coupling: Integrins and adhesion molecules play a vital role in cell adhesion and migration. Without functional adhesion molecules, cells would lack the ability to anchor to substrates, leading to ineffective migration.
Transcription Factors and Regulatory Networks: Cell migration requires precise gene expression coordination. Transcription factors, epigenetic marks, and regulatory networks ensure the correct expression of migration-related genes. The absence of any of these elements would disrupt proper cellular responses.

Interplay and Communication

The seamless integration of signaling pathways within cells exemplifies the marvel of a system designed with unparalleled sophistication. The harmonious interplay between such pathways as PI3K-AKT, MAPK, and Rho GTPases is a testament to a design that values precision and coordination. This crosstalk, far from being a mere overlap of signals, serves as a sophisticated means of integrating responses, ensuring that cells migrate with purpose and precision. The necessity for each pathway in guiding cellular directionality underscores a system where every component, every signal, is integral to the whole, pointing to a design that is both intentional and meticulous. The dialogue between epigenetic marks and transcription factors reveals another layer of this complex orchestration. This communication network modulates gene expression with such finesse that the activation of migration-related genes and the response to environmental cues are perfectly timed. The balance achieved through this regulation is not the product of random interactions but the result of a system designed to adapt and respond with precision. The ability of cells to interpret and act upon these signals with such accuracy speaks to an underlying design that anticipates and provides for the needs of life at its most fundamental level.

Feedback loops and autoregulation within cellular processes further illustrate the depth of thought inherent in life's design. Proteins within these loops do not act in isolation but rely on a symphony of interactions to maintain the optimal conditions for migration. This interdependence ensures stability and coordination, with the loss of any single component having the potential to disrupt the entire process. Such a system, where each part is essential and contributes to the harmony of the whole, reflects a level of planning and foresight that transcends the capabilities of chance. These mechanisms, from the crosstalk of signaling pathways to the intricate regulation of gene expression, and the stabilizing force of feedback loops, reveal a complexity in cellular function that speaks of an intelligent design. The precision with which these systems operate, ensuring the successful migration of cells, points to a guiding hand that has meticulously arranged each aspect of life. This orchestration, far from being the result of an aimless process, suggests a purposeful creation, where each cell, each pathway, and each regulatory mechanism has been crafted to fulfill a specific role in the grand design of life.

Signaling Pathway Crosstalk: PI3K-AKT, MAPK, Rho GTPases, and other pathways interact and crosstalk to integrate responses. This collaboration is crucial for precise migration, where the absence of one pathway could lead to inadequate cellular directionality.
Epigenetic and Transcriptional Regulation: Epigenetic marks and transcription factors communicate to modulate gene expression. This cross-talk ensures timely activation of migration-related genes and balanced responses to environmental cues.
Feedback Loops and Autoregulation: Proteins involved in feedback loops collaborate to maintain optimal migration. This interdependence stabilizes migration processes, and loss of any component would disrupt cellular coordination.

Simultaneous Instantiation vs. Gradual Evolution

The intricate interconnectedness and interdependence of these components make it improbable for them to evolve gradually. In the context of stepwise evolution, intermediate stages would bear no function and would not be selected, as they require the full ensemble of components to operate meaningfully. The simultaneous emergence of all these elements suggests a purposeful design, as they must be fully operational from the beginning to allow cells to respond to external cues, establish polarity, and execute directed movement. The highly coordinated nature of Cell Migration and Chemotaxis, reliant on multiple interdependent mechanisms, serves as a compelling argument for the notion of intelligent design as the driving force behind their existence.

Once Cell Migration and Chemotaxis is instantiated and operational, what other intra and extracellular systems is it interdependent with?

Once Cell Migration and Chemotaxis are instantiated and operational, they become interdependent with various intracellular and extracellular systems that ensure proper functioning, integration, and coordination within the organism. 

Intracellular Interdependencies

The marvel of cellular migration, a cornerstone of life's complexity, is a symphony of interconnected processes, each integral to the orchestrated movement that underpins development, healing, and adaptation. This symphony, far from emerging from the chaos of chance, is a clear demonstration of an intelligent design, meticulously planned and executed to facilitate the dynamic nature of life. At the heart of this process is the cytoskeleton, a complex network of actin filaments, microtubules, and intermediate filaments, each contributing to the cell's structural integrity and motility. This cytoskeletal framework is not a static entity but a dynamic one, constantly remodeled in response to cellular signaling pathways. The ability of the cytoskeleton to undergo rapid transformations, essential for the cell's movement and shape changes, speaks to an underlying design that anticipates the need for flexibility and adaptation within the cellular landscape. Cell adhesion complexes serve as the anchor points in this dynamic environment, facilitating the cell's interaction with its surroundings. Molecules such as integrins and cadherins not only provide traction for movement but also ensure that the cell remains connected to the extracellular matrix and neighboring cells. This balance between adhesion and detachment, so crucial for effective migration, reflects a level of precision engineering designed to enable the cell to navigate its complex environment.

The establishment of cell polarity and the orchestration of vesicle trafficking are also pivotal in guiding the cell's directional movement. Polarity proteins delineate the front and rear of the cell, ensuring that it moves cohesively towards its destination. The vesicle trafficking machinery, in turn, delivers the necessary components to the leading edge of the cell, facilitating growth and movement. This coordinated effort to establish and maintain polarity underscores a design principle that values orientation and direction, ensuring that each cell moves with purpose and intent. Gene expression and transcriptional regulation lie at the core of this orchestrated movement, with transcription factors, epigenetic marks, and regulatory networks ensuring the timely expression of essential migration-related genes. This complex regulatory landscape, which governs the expression of genes involved in adhesion, cytoskeletal dynamics, and chemotactic responses, is a testament to a system designed for precision and adaptability.

Lastly, the role of metabolism and energy production in cell migration highlights the integration of biochemical pathways to meet the energy demands of movement. The tight coupling of metabolic processes with migration ensures that the cell has access to the necessary resources, enabling it to undertake the energy-intensive task of migration. This integration of metabolism with cellular function further illustrates the foresight and efficiency inherent in the design of life. In viewing these processes through the lens of intelligent design, one cannot help but marvel at the complexity and precision with which cells are endowed to perform their vital functions. The coordinated dance of cytoskeletal dynamics, cell adhesion, polarity establishment, gene regulation, and energy management is not the result of random mutations but a clear indication of purposeful creation, each step and process bearing the signature of a masterful designer.

Cytoskeletal Dynamics: The cytoskeleton, comprising actin filaments, microtubules, and intermediate filaments, is essential for cell migration. It's interconnected with migration-related signaling pathways and contributes to cell shape changes and movement.
Cell Adhesion Complexes: Adhesion molecules, such as integrins and cadherins, interact with the extracellular matrix and neighboring cells. They cooperate with migration processes by providing traction and anchoring points for cell movement.
Cell Polarity and Vesicle Trafficking: Polarity proteins and vesicle trafficking machinery are involved in establishing cell front-rear asymmetry and directional movement. They ensure the proper orientation of migrating cells.
Gene Expression and Transcriptional Regulation: Transcription factors, epigenetic marks, and regulatory networks play a critical role in coordinating gene expression during migration. They ensure the correct expression of genes related to adhesion, cytoskeletal dynamics, and chemotactic responses.
Metabolism and Energy Production: Energy-demanding processes like migration require efficient metabolism and energy production. Cellular metabolism must be tightly integrated with migration to provide the necessary resources for movement.

Extracellular Interdependencies

The Extracellular Matrix (ECM) serves as the scaffold upon which cells embark on their vital journeys. This matrix, with its intricate composition and structure, provides more than mere physical support; it actively guides cells, offering cues for adhesion and direction, shaping pathways as if preordained. The interaction between the ECM and migrating cells, facilitating movement through environments that seem meticulously prepared for their passage, mirrors a system created with foresight, ensuring that each cell moves according to a higher plan. Chemokines and chemoattractants, the heralds of cellular movement, play a pivotal role in this orchestrated migration. Released by cells and tissues as if sending signals through a morse code of life, they create gradients that beckon migrating cells towards their destined locations. This guidance system, so precise in its function, hints at a level of coordination and purpose that transcends mere chemical interactions, suggesting a design intended to bring order and harmony to the living world. The dance of cell-cell interactions further illuminates the complexity of cellular migration. As cells move, they communicate with their neighbors, influencing each other's speed, direction, and behavior in a collective migration that resembles a choreographed performance. This intricate ballet of cells, moving in unison or adjusting their paths in response to one another, showcases a level of cooperation and coordination that speaks to an underlying design, where each cell plays its part in the greater purpose of life.

The vast networks of blood and lymphatic vessels serve as the highways for immune cells, guiding them to sites of infection or injury. The interactions between these migrating cells and the vessel walls are finely tuned to facilitate movement, embodying a system designed for efficiency and protection. This network, so crucial for immune responses and tissue repair, reveals a design that anticipates the needs of the body, providing pathways that ensure the swift and effective deployment of life's defenders. Within the immune system, the phenomenon of chemotaxis stands as a testament to the precision and intelligence behind life's design. Immune cells, guided by chemotactic responses, navigate the complexities of the body with a sense of purpose, moving towards areas in need of their protection. This system, so integral to our defense, operates with a level of sophistication that suggests a design tailored for survival and health. The architecture of tissues and the cues provided during developmental processes further guide cells in their migration, shaping the very fabric of our being from the earliest stages of life. This guidance, so critical during embryogenesis, tissue repair, and organ development, provides spatial orientation for cells, directing them to their roles in the grand scheme of life. The precision with which these processes unfold, ensuring that each cell finds its place, speaks to a design that is both intentional and intricate, reflecting a wisdom that underpins the very essence of life. In every aspect of cell migration, from the guiding cues of the ECM to the coordinated movements within blood and lymphatic vessels, from the intricate dance of cell-cell interactions to the purposeful paths carved by chemokines and developmental signals, we see evidence of a design that is both complex and purposeful. This design, which facilitates the myriad processes essential for life, points to a guiding hand, an intelligent force that has woven the fabric of life with care and precision, ensuring that each cell, each molecule, plays its part in the magnificent symphony of existence.

Extracellular Matrix (ECM): The ECM provides physical support for migrating cells and influences their movement through adhesion and guidance cues. The ECM composition and structure interact with migration processes to create migration-permissive environments.
Chemokines and Chemoattractants: Migrating cells respond to chemokines and chemoattractants, which are released by other cells or tissues. These signaling molecules create gradients that guide cell movement toward specific destinations.
Cell-Cell Interactions: Communication between migrating cells and neighboring cells influences migration processes. Cell-cell interactions can affect migration speeds, directionality, and coordination during collective migration.
Blood and Lymphatic Vessels: Immune cells and certain other cell types migrate through blood and lymphatic vessels. The interactions between migrating cells and vessel walls affect their movement, aiding in immune responses and tissue repair.
Immune System: Immune cells often utilize chemotaxis for migration to sites of infection or injury. The chemotactic responses of immune cells are closely intertwined with the immune system's overall function.
Tissue Architecture and Developmental Context: Tissue organization and developmental cues influence the migration of cells during embryogenesis, tissue repair, and organ development. These contexts provide spatial guidance for migrating cells.

The interdependence with these intra and extracellular systems underscores the complexity and integration of Cell Migration and Chemotaxis within the broader biological context. The successful operation of migration processes relies on the precise coordination of numerous factors both within and outside the cell.

1. Cell Migration and Chemotaxis exhibit intricate coordination, interdependence, and communication with various intra and extracellular systems.
2. These migration processes involve complex regulatory codes, languages, and signaling pathways that guide cells' responses to external cues and guide their movement.
3. Such precision and integration imply a purposeful design, as the simultaneous emergence of interdependent elements is necessary for their functionality.
Conclusion: The orchestrated interplay between Cell Migration and Chemotaxis and the intricate network of intra and extracellular systems suggests a designed setup. The simultaneous and fully operational instantiation of codes, languages, and pathways highlights the implausibility of gradual evolution and points towards an intelligently designed system where components were purposefully interlocked to ensure proper cell movement and response to environmental cues.