Intelligent Design: The Glass is Empty - Is it really ? 1
to have some fun.....
i wonder why it has .edu in the link
The Intelligent Design (ID) argument doesn't qualify as a proper scientific theory.
The ID argument has the trappings of a logical argument, but it is full of logical gaps and holes. It is "pseudo-logic".
No scientific evidence specifically supports the assumptions of the theory. Any evidence seemingly supportive of it could equally support countless other fantastic theories, even contradictory ones.
The argument uses words in deceptive ways, without carefully defining them.
https://www.lhup.edu/~dsimanek/philosop/empty.htm
to have some fun.....
i wonder why it has .edu in the link
The Intelligent Design (ID) argument doesn't qualify as a proper scientific theory.
The ID argument has the trappings of a logical argument, but it is full of logical gaps and holes. It is "pseudo-logic".
No scientific evidence specifically supports the assumptions of the theory. Any evidence seemingly supportive of it could equally support countless other fantastic theories, even contradictory ones.
The argument uses words in deceptive ways, without carefully defining them.
https://www.lhup.edu/~dsimanek/philosop/empty.htm
