Defending the Christian Worldview, Creationism, and Intelligent Design
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.
Defending the Christian Worldview, Creationism, and Intelligent Design

This is my personal virtual library, where i collect information, which leads in my view to the Christian faith, creationism, and Intelligent Design as the best explanation of the origin of the physical Universe, life, and biodiversity


You are not connected. Please login or register

Defending the Christian Worldview, Creationism, and Intelligent Design » Origin of life » Differences in the 3 domains of life

Differences in the 3 domains of life

Go down  Message [Page 1 of 1]

1Differences in the 3 domains of life Empty Differences in the 3 domains of life Fri Aug 07, 2015 5:39 pm

Otangelo


Admin

Differences in the 3 domains of life1

https://reasonandscience.catsboard.com/t2144-differences-in-the-3-domains-of-life

Differences in the 3 domains of life Three_10
Carl Woese and the three domains of life.
A. Woese proposed that archaea constitute a third domain of life.
B. Three domains form a monophyletic tree based on small-subunit rRNA sequences. The length of each branch approximates the time of divergence from the last common ancestor

Differences in the 3 domains of life 17457310

While bacteria and archaea share a number of fundamental traits including transcription, ribosomal translation, aspects of amino acid biosynthesis and chemiosmotic coupling using a membrane-integral ATP synthase, several other fundamental traits are shockingly different (Martin and Russell 2003; Sousa et al. 2013). For example, most enzymes involved in DNA replication are not homologous in bacteria and archaea

Most importantly, the cell membrane and cell wall are radically different in their chemistry and stereochemistry (Koga et al. 1998; Peretó et al. 2004), as are the enzymes for lipid biosynthesis (Martin and Russell 2003; Peretó et al. 2004; Lombard et al. 2012). Biochemical pathways such as glycolysis (Say and Fuchs 2010), and heme and quinone synthesis (Sousa et al. 2013) are also distinct, albeit with some confounding LGT. Such considerations imply that fermentation and respiration, or more specifically the heme and quinone-dependent proteins used for respiratory ion pumping, arose independently in the bacteria and archaea, but see Ducluzeau et al. (2014) for a contrary view.

there are only six known pathways of carbon fixation across all life (Fuchs 2011), but just one of these, the acetyl CoA pathway, is found in both archaea (methanogens) and bacteria (acetogens), albeit with some striking differences between them

LUCA was chemiosmotic, and so required a membrane – but there is little in  common  between  archaeal  and  bacterial  plasma  membranes or cell walls. Archaeal membranes are composed of isoprenoid side chains, joined by ether bonds to L-glycerol; bacteria use fatty acids, joined by ester bonds to D-glycerol. While there are points in common, such as the use of glycerol (albeit different enantiomers), the differences are stark, and lipid synthesis is catalysed by distinct enzymes. 2

So LUCA was chemiosmotic, requiring a membrane, but apparently did not have a membrane comparable to that in either modern archaea or bacteria.

Differences in the 3 domains of life Tree_o10
This figure shows the universal phylogenetic tree, established by the work of Woese, Iwabe et al. Hyperthermophiles are indicated by bold lines and by bold type.

1) http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4247476/
2) http://www.researchgate.net/publication/41167227_How_did_LUCA_make_a_living_Chemiosmosis_in_the_origin_of_life

https://reasonandscience.catsboard.com

Back to top  Message [Page 1 of 1]

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum