Intelligent Design, the best explanation of Origins

This is my personal virtual library, where i collect information, which leads in my view to Intelligent Design as the best explanation of the origin of the physical Universe, life, and biodiversity

You are not connected. Please login or register

Intelligent Design, the best explanation of Origins » Philosophy and God » Atheism » Atheism: How to define it

Atheism: How to define it

Go down  Message [Page 1 of 1]

1Atheism: How to define it Empty Atheism: How to define it on Sun 13 Jan 2019 - 18:03


Atheism: How to define it

Negative atheism, also called weak atheism and soft atheism, is any type of atheism where a person does not believe in the existence of any deities but does not explicitly assert that there are none.1

Positive atheism, also called strong atheism and hard atheism, is the form of atheism that additionally asserts that no deities exist

Agnosticism is the view that the existence of God, of the divine or the supernatural is unknown or unknowable. An agnostic can also be one who holds neither of two opposing positions on a topic. 2

Skepticism (American English) or scepticism is generally any questioning attitude or doubt towards one or more items of putative knowledge or belief. 3

Freethought (or "free thought")is a philosophical viewpoint which holds that positions regarding truth should be formed on the basis of logic, reason, and empiricism, rather than authority, tradition, revelation, or dogma 4

Atheism simply states there is no God: However, the 'belief' in God is logic based; albeit, fundamentally flawed. Strong atheism requires proof of both the existence and nonexistence of God without contradiction:
Proof of God: In accordance with the infinitesimal calculus (proof) the existence of God is 100%.
Proof of the nonexistence of God: That, is in dealing with the infinitesimal calculus itself, which is God.
In short, the 'creator' is an infinitesimal calculus. Albeit, creator is poor word choice, the calculus cannot do otherwise.
~ There is no such thing as an Atheist (example: there is no such thing as a non-scientist. nor a non teacher). Although, the term is often used to provoke the antagonist in the non-atheism group.
The purpose of provocation is to solicit a psychodrama enactment. Whereby, the ensuing debates challenge cognitive dissonance in 'both' groups.
The issue regarding 'cognitive dissonance' among the Atheism groups involves affixing the term Atheist to their ego.
The issue regarding cognitive dissonance among atheism groups involves the atheist-identifier, affixed to ego, enacting a self-righteous validation: Whereby, the self-identified 'atheist' expects more from others (proof of God) than they require from themselves (proof of the nonexistence of God); which is an act of intellectual dishonesty.

Atheism: How to define it Atheis10


Back to top  Message [Page 1 of 1]

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum