Why do we not see genus homo in all variations and evolutionary stages ? why are there not different stages of homo sapiens, some with a much more primitive language , others with a more advanced one ? some with bigger brains, some with smaller brains ? why do we have all the same morphology, why not wings, super legs, different skins, super ears like bats, different eyes, lungs to remain one hour in the water, echo location, why do we die all with about the same age , why can we not be without dying, like Box Jelly fish ? why can we not orient ourselfs with electro magnetism, like pigeons, dogs, and cats ? why can we not kill our enemies with electro schocks, like eels ? why do africans in the savannah not be able to evolve to run fast like usain bolt ? why do men have beards, and woman not ? why do eskimos not have all their skin with fur , to prevent from cold ? Let say someone mutated perfectly formed wings on their back to fly (Or you may imagine one of the x-men mutations for example as well). As ridiculous as this may sound, proponents of evolution have to accept this as possible, for how did reptiles learn to fly?
If Darwin’s theory is true science, why are there no samples of ongoing evolution today? There are currently about 30 million different species that inhabit the earth. Out of that 30 million, evolutionists cite as proof on ongoing evolution: (1) bacteria that can eat nylon and others that become resistant to antibiotics, (2) flies that don’t mate with other flies after two groups have been separated for a time, and (3) the peppered moth in England that changed colors from white to black, supposedly due to a change that occurred in it’s environment. If anything, this is overwhelming evidence that evolution is not taking place. Any true science would come to that conclusion. But evolution is is made up of mostly imagined fables as proof, and it is so completely lacking in hard evidence, anything that they can find is considered evidence. In any case, the bacteria, flies, and moths are not the kind of evolution that would bring about sight, hearing, or pumping blood; I don’t care how many billions of years are available. Of the trillions of fish in the ocean, aren’t there any that would like to move to land to avoid man’s hooks and those pesky sharks? Where are the fish with gradually growing legs today, or animals with hemi-ping-pong ball eyes? Why is it that evolution only happens when no one is looking? Why are all fossils that would prove evolution in the “not found yet” category? For evolution to be true, we should be living in a world prolific with examples. We should see an ongoing miraculous overwhelming biological phenomena, prevalent everywhere. It isn’t.
If natural selection were true, Eskimos would have fur to keep warm, but they don't. They are just as hairless as everyone else. If natural selection were true, humans in the tropics would have silver, reflective skin to help them keep cool, but they don't. They have black skin, just the opposite of what the theory of natural selection would predict.
If natural selection were true humans at northern latitudes would have black skin, but they have white skin instead, except the Eskimos who have skin that is halfway between white and black. The people from Russia and the Nordic countries have white skin, blood hair and blue eyes. This is the opposite of what one would predict if natural selection controlled skin color.
Many evolutionists argue that melanin is a natural sunscreen that evolved in a greater amount to protect dark-skinned people who live near the Equator. They simply ignore the fact that dark-skinned Eskimos live north of the Arctic Circle. Melanin in the skin is not a sound argument in favor of evolution. Dark-skinned people have always lived near the Equator, not white-skinned people, even though the dark skin is more uncomfortable in the hot, sunny climate.
Black skin absorbs the heat from the sun's rays more than white skin. Humans show no sign of natural selection based on the environment. The theory of natural selection is wrong because it cannot create something in the DNA that wasn't there in the beginning.
Animals like bears, tigers, lions, and zebras living near the equator have heavy fur while humans living north of the Artic Circle have bare skin. A leopard from the jungle near the equator has fur like the snow leopard of the Himalayas.
The snow leopard grows thicker hair but the jungle leopard would also if moved to a cold climate. Horses and dogs grow a heavy winter coat in colder climates. Natural selection isn't working as falsely claimed by Charles Darwin.
The cheetah in Africa is an example of an animal in the cat family with very limited variety in the DNA. Each cheetah looks like an identical twin. The cheetah DNA is so identical that the skin from one cheetah can be grafted into another cheetah without any rejection by the body.
To each of the examples above, there is a equivalent in the animal world.
Tibetans in the Himalayas have evolved to better adapt to low oxygen at high altitudes over just a few hundred generations, according to research published last year.
But that's a far less giant variation, than we see in the animal world.
There, we see :
Rats evolving in Flying squirrels:
Why should that be possible in the animal world, but not with us, humans? Why did we have to evolve first advanced brains, to then invent and biomimic flight?
Would it not be more direct, and more perfect, if we would evolve wings, for example?
Last edited by Otangelo on Tue Dec 01, 2020 1:23 am; edited 8 times in total